Sticking to the “Factual."

  • Man Ray’s Le Retour à la raison (1923), Marcel Ducham
Artikel in Fachzeitschrift (peer-reviewed)

Ort, Datum

São Paulo (Brasilien), 2014

Schlagwörter

Kunstwissenschaften, Medienforschung, Dada Film, Tactility, Man Ray, Marcel Duchamp, Peter Tscherkassky

URL

aim.org.pt/ojs/index.php/revista/article/view/93/66

Beschreibung

The present article seeks to show that, for the Dadaists, film was an unsatisfying medium because as a technically reproduced artifact it counteracted Dada’s sense of immediacy. The focus of my paper revolves around the notion of “facticity” inspired by Wieland Herzfelde, for whom Dada represented a reaction to all attempts at disavowing the “factual.” Manifestations of Dada, such as the readymade, live performance, collage, photomontage and not least the photogram, attest to a radically new understanding of realism in art, adhering to an “anti-mimetic concept of realism” (Elsaesser). As I will argue, Dada did not capitulate to film, but made a ‘compromise,’ by exploring different strategies to reinsert the “factual“ into this medium of reproduction. This could be done by (1) turning a screening into a live performance, (2) eliciting a bodily reaction in the spectator, (3) experimenting with hand-made, camera-less devices of film making, and (4) calling to mind the material existence of the cinematic apparatus. What these strategies have in common is to minimalize (although not necessarily to abolish) the distance between “reality” and its representation in order to maintain film’s initial tactility, as described by Walter Benjamin in “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Man Ray’s "Le Retour à la raison" (1923) and Marcel Duchamp’s "Anémic cinéma" (1924–26) are prototypes of the Dadaist ‘compromise.’ A similar impetus can be found in a more recent example, "Dream Work" (2001), the third part of Peter Tscherkassky’s CinemaScope-Trilogy, which explicitly refers to the early days of French experimental film. What these three films, despite their differences, have in common, is to privilege a certain immediacy (be it during the moment of production or during the moment of reception) and to include an element of tactility, usually absent from cinematic works.

Band, Seiten

Vol. 1 n° 2, 314–327

Sprache, Format, Material, Ausgabe/Auflage

Englisch

Aktivitätenlisten

Veröffentlicht Von: Gabriele Jutz | Universität für Angewandte Kunst Wien | Veröffentlicht Am: 09. Mai 2022, 11:45 | Geändert Am: 24. November 2022, 09:32